Jb Obrien and if It Doesnt Count I Will See You Again
A lawyer has told the Lloyd Rayney phone-bugging trial she caved into giving police a statement afterward being told she and her brother would be charged if she did non cooperate.
Clare O'Brien is a former colleague and friend of Mr Rayney and is testifying at his trial on charges of bugging the phone at the family's home in 2007 earlier the expiry of his married woman Corryn.
Ms O'Brien testified she helped put him in contact with the human being who has admitted installing the bugging equipment after Mr Rayney told her about the deterioration of his union.
Under cantankerous-exam she testified that her first argument was made to police afterwards 2 detectives threatened to charge her and her brother unless she cooperated.
Ms O'Brien said 2 officers came to meet her in Donnybrook where she was working and told her lxxx detectives had already been allocated to the investigation into Mr Rayney.
She testified when she was asked what she would exist charged with, they would not give her an answer but said "I had one of two choices. To exist a co-defendant or a witness".
Ms O'Brien said she did non desire to be bullied into giving a statement and wanted to get legal advice but "caved" when she was told her blood brother was in the cells in a constabulary station in Perth.
They said "If I didn't cooperate, my brother would exist charged. I approximate in that location's a betoken when you cave in," she said.
The court as well heard the detectives made this statement to Ms O'Brien, "You know how information technology works Clare. Nosotros charge y'all, y'all lose your job. Your reputation is destroyed."
"You can't get a good lawyer considering you have no coin and then we drib the charges and you are yesterday'due south news."
Ms O'Brien testified today "I couldn't believe what I was hearing ... I was extremely scared and realised the situation was out of control."
Home surveillance queries made: witness
Ms O'Brien told the court she became friends with Mr Rayney after she started work in 1994 as a junior lawyer at the role of the Director of Public Prosecutions where he was a senior lawyer.
She said they remained in contact after she left the office 10 years subsequently and on one occasion in mid-2007 she and her fiancé had what she called a "lovely and relaxed" lunch with the couple at their home.
She testified about later receiving a call from Mr Rayney in which he told her he was having marriage difficulties.
Ms O'Brien said she provided aid and advice to him about his aging union because she thought his wife was trying to "set him upwards".
She said Mr Rayney likewise expressed concern his wife "had told him in forepart of his two daughters he shouldn't exist in their bedrooms at night" and that she was sending him emails "implying" things had happened.
"I said it was obvious she was trying to create an email trail that sure things had happened when they hadn't ... to fix a simulated email trail to apply pressure on him" in divorce proceedings, she said.
Ms O'Brien said at a afterward date when she had coffee with Mr Rayney he asked her whether she knew anyone who knew anything about home security or surveillance.
"Because nosotros had spoken about her writing emails that implicated him in going to the girls' bedrooms at night, I was making the assumption that he was mayhap wanting to safeguard his position," she told the court.
"That was my interpretation because if y'all put in security cameras and someone'southward alleging yous're doing something ... if y'all put in a photographic camera everyone can look at the footage. That's what was in my mind."
Ms O'Brien testified she then bundled for Mr Rayney to be put in contact with a friend of her brother who she believed had a business installing security cameras.
It is alleged that person, Timothy Pearson, was then paid by Mr Rayney to install a device in his abode to record phone conversations to discover out what his wife was saying about him.
Under cross-exam, Ms O'Brien said both Mr and Mrs Rayney were obviously devoted parents to their two daughters and their focus was on the wellbeing of the children.
She said she had advised Mr Rayney to movement out of the business firm but he had wanted to "stick it out".
"I think he was upset and frustrated at being blocked, at not existence able to fix the human relationship," she said.
The trial continues tomorrow.
Posted , updated
Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-30/rayney-colleague-threatened-with-charges-by-police-court-told/6434446
0 Response to "Jb Obrien and if It Doesnt Count I Will See You Again"
Post a Comment